1 HN, J W.P.No.32714_2013 APHC010119772013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32714/2013 Between: 1. SMT. S.VENKATA MARUTI, D/O. S.HARI PRASADA RAO AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 2. SRI L.VENKATESWARA, S/O. L.KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 3. SRI CH.SREENIVASA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 4. SMT P.DEEPA, D/O. GOVINDA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 5. SMT T.SUPRAJA, D/O.JANAKIRAM AGED 39 YERS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ALL ARE EMPLOYEES OF TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, Tirupati, Chittoor District. Reptd. by its Executive Officer. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of 2 HN, J W.P.No.32714_2013 writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent T.T. Devasthanams not acting on the basis of confirmed seniority list of Assistant Executive Engineers in ROC No.TL1/14819/2008, dated 7-6-2009 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 16 and 14 of the Fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent T.T. Devasthanams to conduct D.P.C. for the cadre of Deputy Executive Engineers posts from the eligible candidates left over in the confirmed seniority list IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 40674 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent T.T. Devasthanams to consider the case of the petitioners for the promotion as Deputy Executive Engineers (Civil) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K VENUGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. NVS PRASADA VARMA 3 HN, J W.P.No.32714_2013 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that, subsequent to the filing of the present writ petition, the petitioners have been duly considered and promoted by the competent authorities. It is further submitted that, in view of the said development, the grievance in the writ petition is no longer survives for consideration. The learned counsel, therefore, submits that no further orders are required to be passed in the matter. 2. Recording the said submission and taking the same on record, this Court is of the considered view that nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition. In view of the subsequent promotions granted to the petitioner, the writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.02.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.32714_2013 258 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32714 of 2013 Date: 17.02.2026 NKA