Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18714 (RAJ)

DR RAJENDRA VERMA S/O BABULAL BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13631/2025 · 2026-01-07

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:320] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13631/2025 Dr Rajendra Verma S/o Babulal Bairwa, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Trilok Nagar, Gangapur City, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Medical Education Department, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, Medical Education Department, Jaipur. 3. Director, Rajasthan Medical Education Socieity, Jaipur. 4. Principal And Controller, Govt. Medical College, Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshita Sharma for Dr. Mahesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 07/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not refute that the petitioner would be covered under the definition of ‘government servant’, as prescribed under Section 2(c) of Rajasthan Civil Services (Service Matters Appellate Tribunals) Act 1976 (for short “Act of 1976”), nor could the learned counsel for the petitioner refute that the lis in question also falls under the ‘service matters’, as defined under Section 2(f) of the Act of 1976. In view thereof, since the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy available in law, the learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to approach the [2026:RJ-JP:320] (2 of 2) [CW-13631/2025] Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal (for short “RAT”) for redressal of his grievance. 2. Considering the oral prayer, the present petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the RAT for redressal of his grievance. If the petitioner files appropriate petition before the RAT within a period of 30 days, the RAT shall adjudicate the same on merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months. 3. Needless to say, no prejudice to be caused to the petitioner based on any observations made hereinabove. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /67