THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION (LOCAL AREA) DIVISION, DHULE NOW OFFICE NANDURBAR v. RAJENDRA WAMAN PATIL AND OTHERS
CA/14917/2015 · 2026-10-05
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18712 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18712 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
8-CA-14917-2015.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14917 OF 2015 IN FAST/32666/2015 The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation (local Area) Division, Dhule Now Office Nandurbar VERSUS Rajendra Waman Patil And Others WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14916 OF 2015 IN FAST/32666/2015 The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation (local Area) Division, Dhule Now Office Nandurbar VERSUS Rajendra Waman Patil And Others WITH FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32666 OF 2015 The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation (local Area) Division, Dhule Now Office Nandurbar VERSUS Rajendra Waman Patil And Others ... Mr. Subhash S. Chillarge for the Applicant. Mr. R. C. Patil a/w S. V. Bhosale for Respondent No.1. ...
CORAM :
SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE :
05 OCTOBER 2026 P. C.: Civil Application No.14916 of 2015:-
1. The Civil Application No.14916 of 2015 is filed for condonation of delay of 1677 days in filing First Appeal. Shubham 2026:BHC-AUG:47826
8-CA-14917-2015.doc
2. Considering the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and delay in filing the First Appeal is condoned. First Appeal:-
3. The First Appeal is not on board. Taken on board.
4. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant.
5. By this Appeal, the Appellant assails the judgment and award dated 24.12.2010 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. No.473/2005.
6.
Learned counsel submit that the compensation granted by the learned Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted by the SLAO.
7. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times.
8. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned award. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed.
9. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly.
[SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.] Shubham