[2026:RJ-JP:2512] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11247/2025 Ravindra @ Bengan @ Radhey S/o Layak Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Badapura, Police Station Mansukhpura, District Agra, U.p., Presently R/o Vichola, Police Station Rajakhera, District Dholpur, Raj. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 21/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 898/2023 registered at Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 394, 302 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the main allegation of causing death of the deceased by gun shot injury is against the other co-accused Rahul. The petitioner is in custody since 03.04.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:2512] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11247/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the bail application of the other similarly placed co-accused Sukhveer and Rahul were dismissed by this Court vide order dated 05.03.2025 on merits and the allegation against the petitioner is akin with that of the other co- accused. The petitioner was also present along with the other co- accused at the place of occurrence, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the police after thorough investigation arrested the accused-petitioner and concluded that the accused-petitioner along with the other co-accused Rahul and Sukhveer entered into the house of deceased Sahil, committed robbery and also caused death of the deceased by gun shot injury, therefore, considering the aforesaid fact, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Hence, the criminal bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/2