Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18711 (CAL)

DHIREN MONDAL v. R S BHATTACHARYA & ANR

CRC/30/2017 · 2026-01-07

Apurba Sinha Ray, Arijit Banerjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.01.2026 Item No. 13 Court No.08. S. De 266045 C.R.C. 30 of 2017 (in MAT 1446 of 2014) Dhiren Mondal. Vs. R S Bhattacharya & Anr. Mr. M.S. Yadav, Ms. S. Chatterjee, Ms. Satabdi Naskar ( Kundu) …for the alleged contemnor. Dictated by Arijit Banerjee, J. 1. This is an old matter of 2017. The petitioner has taken no step for hearing of this matter. Obviously he is not interested in proceeding with the matter. 2. In the first call, nobody appeared for the petitioner. In the second call also, nobody appears. 3. Learned advocate for the alleged contemnor is present. 4. CRC 30 of 2017 is dismissed. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. The Rule stands discharged. (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)