2026:JHHC:19292 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5977 of 2026 Jitendra Sah @ Jitendra Kumar Sah, aged about 41 years, Son of Ashok Sah … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … ... Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, APP --- 02/01.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.03.2026 in connection with Godda Mufassil P.S. Case No. 31 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109 & 69 of the B.N.S., 2023, pending in the Court of learned C.J.M, Godda. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that chargesheet has been submitted on 05.05.2026. He has further submitted that there is an allegation that the victim was called to the house of the petitioner by his son and then she was assaulted by the family members of the petitioner. He submits that there is allegation that petitioner has been physically exploiting the victim since last 5 years. The learned counsel further submits that similarly situated co-accused, the wife of the petitioner, has been enlarged on bail in B.A. No. 5601 of 2026 vide order dated 24.06.2026. The learned counsel submits that the victim suffered simple injuries. The learned counsel submits that the case of the petitioner is on similar footing and there is omnibus allegation with regard to all the co-accused. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that there is allegation against the petitioner that he made physical relationship with the victim on false assurance of marriage and other submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the victim is said to have received simple 2 injury and the co-accused has been enlarged on bail, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Godda, in connection with Godda Mufassil P.S. Case No. 31 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 01.07.2026 Uploaded on 03.07.2026 Pramanik/