Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18706 (KAR)

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC v. SAVITHA

MFA/1061/2021 · 2026-06-02

Jayant Banerji, Tara Vitasta Ganju

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25801-DB MFA No. 1061 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1061 OF 2021 (MV-D) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC, BANNIMANTAP BADAVANE MYSORE NOW, REP. BY KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICE, BANGALORE BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER BANGALORE. …APPELLANT (BY SMT.S.NIRMMALA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SAVITHA W/O. LATE SIVAKUMAR T.R. AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 2. KUM. NIKITHA D/O. LATE SIVAKUMAR T.R. AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS 3. PRUTHVI NAYAKA S/O. LATE SIVAKUMAR T.R. AGED ABOUT 06 YEARS 4. RAMAKRISHNA NAYAKA S/O. LATE MANCHANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 5. VANAJAKSHI A W/O. RAMAKRISHNAYAKA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25801-DB MFA No. 1061 of 2021 ALL ARE R/AT THIPURU VILLAGE K.R. NAGARA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT (APPELLANT NOS. 2 & 3 MINORS REP. BY NATURAL GUARDIAN HER MOTHER SAVITHA) 6. SIDDARAM BALAKANDE S/O. SANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS A/P/BARADOL, MUDUGAL HOBLI INDI TALUK, BIJAPUR DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI P.NATARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R4 & R5; R2 & R3 MINOR REP. BY R1) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 05.02.2020 PASSED IN M.V.C.NO.936/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AND MACT, K.R.NAGAR, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.16,35,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 9% P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF ITS REALIZATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Despite the matter being called out twice, no one appears for the appellant. When the matter was last listed, a week’s time was finally granted to the appellant to pay process fee for issuance of notice to respondent No.6 and to deposit the award - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25801-DB MFA No. 1061 of 2021 amount, failing which it was directed that the interim order granted would automatically stand vacated. 2. It appears that a memo for dispensation of notice to respondent No.6 has been filed by learned Counsel for the appellant. However, as per the order of the Court, the interim order stands vacated. 3. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE KSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38