1 APHC010445992014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos: 7586 & 9439 of 2014 W.P.No.7586 of 2014: Between: 1. TRUST ASSOCIATION OF CONVENTION OF BAPTIST CHURCHES, OF NORTHERN CIRCARS (CBCNC) REGN NO 12/1960, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN SRI B. BENJAMIN ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,. MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SAMSON BABU 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ASC BOSE(SC FOR GVMC) 2. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA 3. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV W.P.No.9439 of 2014: Between: 1. CONVENTION OF BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NORTHERN CIRCARS & 2 ORS., (CBNC) REP. BY ITS TRUST SECRETARY SRI P. SATYA SREE LATA, D/O. LATE P. MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, DPLOT NO. 36, KAKATIYA BAZAR, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA - 7, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. CONVENTION OF BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NORTHERN CIRCARS, (CBCNC) REP. BY ITS TRUST TREASURER G. SURESH, HYDERABAD. 3. CONVENTION OF BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NORTHERN CIRCARS, (CBCNC) REP. BY ITS TRUST MEMBER P. SIMYONU. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 3 1. G V RAMANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following: ORAL COMMON ORDER: No representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. 2. It transpires from the dockets of both the Writ Petitions that no Interim Order has been granted. Vide Order dated 04.04.2014 in W.P.No.9439 of 2014, this Court had directed to tag W.P.No.9439 of 2014 with W.P.No.7586 of 2014. 3. Thereafter, W.P.No.7586 of 2014 was listed on 17.03.2026 and W.P.No.9439 of 2014 was listed on 16.03.2026. On the said dates, none has represented the Writ Petitioners. Hence, the matters were again directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also there is no appearance on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. 4. In this view of the matter, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:30.03.2026 Vns