Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Tripura · body

2026 DAILYLAW 187 (TRI)

Manjina Khatun for and behalf of Entaj Alam v. The State of Tripura

BA/33/2026 · 2026-02-25

S Datta Purkayastha

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA B.A. No.33 of 2026 Manjina Khatun, W/O- Entaj Alam, aged about 33 years, resident of Fanditpara, Mandalghat, Kudambinihut, P.S. Jalpaiguri, District- Jalpaiguri, West Bengal. For and on behalf of accused Entaj Alam, S/O- late Fafiz Uddin, aged about 39 years, resident of Fanditpara, Mandalghat, Kudambinihut, P.S. Jalpaiguri, District- Jalpaiguri, West Bengal. …… Applicant(s). V e r s u s The State of Tripura ……Respondent(s). For Applicant(s) : Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, Senior Advocate. Mr. Agniva Chakrabarti, Advocate. Mr. Mijanur Rahaman, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raju Datta, PP. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA Order 25/02/2026 Heard Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. Raju Datta, learned PP appearing for the State. Mr. Datta, learned PP submits that charge-sheet has recently been submitted on 03.02.2026 alongwith a prayer for custody trial of the accused-petitioner. In that circumstances, Mr. Bhattacharya, learned senior counsel submits that the applicant begs to withdraw this bail application with a liberty to approach this Court again, if aggrieved by the order of the learned Special Judge on the petition submitted by the Investigating Officer for custody trial of the accused-petitioner and for refusal of bail on that ground. Considered. Liberty as sought for is granted. The bail application is disposed of being not pressed. . JUDGE Dinashree SUJAY GHOSH Digitally signed by SUJAY GHOSH Date: 2026.02.26 17:00:34 +05'30'