Manjina Khatun for and behalf of Entaj Alam v. The State of Tripura
BA/33/2026 · 2026-02-25
S Datta Purkayastha
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 187 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 187 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA B.A. No.33 of 2026
Manjina Khatun, W/O- Entaj Alam, aged about 33 years, resident of Fanditpara, Mandalghat, Kudambinihut, P.S. Jalpaiguri, District- Jalpaiguri, West Bengal.
For and on behalf of accused Entaj Alam, S/O- late Fafiz Uddin, aged about 39 years, resident of Fanditpara, Mandalghat, Kudambinihut, P.S. Jalpaiguri, District- Jalpaiguri, West Bengal.
…… Applicant(s).
V e r s u s The State of Tripura
……Respondent(s).
For Applicant(s)
: Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, Senior Advocate.
Mr. Agniva Chakrabarti, Advocate.
Mr. Mijanur Rahaman, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raju Datta, PP.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA Order
25/02/2026
Heard Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. Raju Datta, learned PP appearing for the State.
Mr. Datta, learned PP submits that charge-sheet has recently been submitted on 03.02.2026 alongwith a prayer for custody trial of the accused-petitioner.
In that circumstances, Mr. Bhattacharya, learned senior counsel submits that the applicant begs to withdraw this bail application with a liberty to approach this Court again, if aggrieved by the order of the learned Special Judge on the petition submitted by the Investigating Officer for custody trial of the accused-petitioner and for refusal of bail on that ground.
Considered.
Liberty as sought for is granted.
The bail application is disposed of being not pressed. .
JUDGE
Dinashree SUJAY GHOSH Digitally signed by SUJAY GHOSH Date: 2026.02.26 17:00:34 +05'30'