Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4419] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6507/2015 Mukesh Chand Saini Son Of Shri Lallu Ram Saini, aged about 26 years, R/o Village And Post Saloli, Tehsil Raini, District Alwar Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur Raj.
2. Inspector General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur Raj.
3. Superintendent Of Police, District Rajsamand Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Ms. Almas Khanam HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 30/01/2026
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for seeking direction against the respondent to conduct physical examination of the petitioner and to consider his candidature for appointment on the post of Constable General, if he is otherwise found suitable.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent at the outset submitted that, the present writ petition pertains to recruitment process initiated in the year 2013. After following the procedure, the recruitment process by this time has been completed by the respondents and thereafter, so many other recruitments have also taken place. In the instant case, there was no interim order in
[2026:RJ-JP:4419] (2 of 2) [CW-6507/2015] favour of the petitioner in the present writ petition and looking to the nature of the dispute where, the petitioner is claiming re- measurement of his height and chest, no relief at this stage can be granted.
Learned counsel for the respondents relies upon the
order dated 18.09.2025 passed by Division Bench of this Court in State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Kamal Kishore Sankhla in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 525/2024 decided on 18.09.2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to controvert the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents. In view of above, there is no merit in the writ petition filed by the petitioner and is, hereby, dismissed.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/74