1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 350 of 2026 1 - Madhubala Verma W/o Sanjay Verma Aged About 33 Years R/o Gram Mungesar, Chandkhuri Farm, Post Chandkhuri, Thana Mandir Hasaud, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Vedant Verma S/o Sanjay Verma Aged About 5 Years Through His Mother / Natural Guardian- Madhubala Verma (Petitioner No. 1), R/o Gram Mungesar, Chandkhuri Farm, Post Chandkhuri, Thana Mandir Hasaud, District Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Sanjay Verma S/o Shri Tekram Verma Aged About 36 Years R/o H. No. 03 / A, Irrigation Colony, In Front Of Collector Residence, Balodabazar, District- Balodabazar, C.G., Other Address- Krishnayan Colony, Balodabazar, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Ruchi Nagar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 24.03.2026 SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.03.30 18:19:01 +0530 2 1. Heard. 2. The present is a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following reliefs:- 10.1 That kindly be pleased to issue a direction to the 2nd Additional Family Court Judge, Raipur to expedite the proceedings of M.C.C. No. 341/2025 (Madhubala Verma & Anr. Vs. Sanjay Verma); 10.2 That kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 16.02.2026 (Annexure P/1), and restore the petitioner's application for attachment to recover arrears of maintenance amount; 10.3 That kindly be pleased to Direct the learned Executing Court to refuse unnecessary adjournments sought by the Respondent. 10.4 Any other relief(s), direction(s), which Hon'ble the Court deems fit, and proper, in the circumstances of the case 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an order of maintenance has been passed in favour of the petitioner on 17.02.2025 by the learned Family Court, whereby an amount of Rs. 15,000/- per month has been awarded in favour of the petitioner and her son. Since, the respondent is not paying the amount of maintenance, she has filed an application under Section 125 (3) of Cr.P.C. before the learned Family Court on 21.03.2025 for execution of the order. The respondent, despite appearing in the execution proceeding, has not paid the entire arrears of maintenance amount and also not paying the monthly maintenance regularly. Since, the respondent is not paying the maintenance amount, 3 she filed an application for issuance of attachment warrant of the properties of the respondent, which has been rejected by the learned Family Court on 16.02.2026 and granted time to him to pay 25 % of the total arrears of the monthly maintenance amount. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that for want of maintenance amount, she is suffering hardship and the nurture of his son is also affecting and the respondent is avoiding the payment of monthly maintenance amount. Therefore, the learned Family Court may be directed not to grant any unnecessary adjournment in the proceeding and to expedite the execution proceeding in accordance with law. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the document annexed with the petition. 6. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as from the perusal of the order sheet produced in the present writ petition which transpires that the petitioner is prosecuting the execution application under Section 125 (3) of Cr.P.C. from 21.03.2025 and till date the execution of the said order could not be affected in its true spirit and the respondent has taken time repeatedly for payment of the arrears of the maintenance amount, therefore, the learned Family Court is directed to expedite the execution proceeding and not to grant any unnecessary adjournment for payment of maintenance amount to the petitioner and to proceed in accordance with law with respect to the execution of maintenance order. 4 7. The petitioner is at liberty to apply for further action pursuant to the execution of her application for recovery of the arrears of maintenance amount in accordance with law and in such eventually learned Family Court shall proceed under the relevant provisions of law. 8. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE sagrika