KULWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/6133/2026 · 2026-05-22
Manisha Batra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18692 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18692 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-6133-20 IN THE H (143) KULWINDER STATE OF PUN
CORAM: HON
Present: Mr.
Ms.
MANISHA BAT
1.
The Constitution of In official responde petitioners at the representation da
2.
It is they are major. T and threats have relatives to kill h petitioner No.2. A 2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH
CR
Dat DER KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus F PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Jagjeet Singh, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed n of India seeking issuance of a writ o spondents No.2 to 3 to protect the the hands of respondents No.4 to tion dated 21.05.2026 (Annexure P-3 It is submitted by the learned coun ajor. They are in love. Their parents ar have even been extended to petitione kill her. She has left her house and o.2. Apprehending danger to their liv
AB AND HARYANA AT
CRWP-6133-2026O&M) Date of decision : 22.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents MANISHA BATRA for the petitioners or DAG, Punjab n filed under Article 226 of the writ of mandamus directing the ct the life and liberty of the to 9 and take action on their 3). d counsel for the petitioners that ents are against their relationship titioner No.1 by her parents and e and has started living with the eir lives and liberty, they sent AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.22 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRWP-6133-20 representation da not been taken in
3.
Noti
4.
Ms on behalf of resp
directed to supply
5.
I ha learned State co their relationship the veracity of th the sanctity of rel of with a directio Batala to look i 21.05.2026 (Ann necessary step, if found.
6.
It is petitioners from them. 22.05.2026 Amit Sharma
2026 (O&M) (2) tion dated 21.05.2026 to the responde ken into consideration and hence, the p Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D f respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. supply the copy of the petition to her. I have heard learned counsel for ate counsel and without going into t onship as well as without entering up y of the averments made in the petitio y of relationship or age of the petitione irection to the respondent No.2-Senior look into the matter and dispose of (Annexure P-3) in accordance wi step, if any, genuine threat to life and It is made clear that this order shall from legal action for violation of l (MA
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye
spondent No.2 but the same has e, the present petition. ior DAG, Punjab, accepts notice stage. The petitioners’ counsel is to her. el for the petitioners as well as into the question of legality of ing upon an exercise to evaluate petition and also with regard to titioners, this petition is disposed Senior Superintendent of Police, ose of the representation dated with law and also to take e and liberty of the petitioners is r shall not be taken to protect the n of law, if any, committed by (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.22 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.