Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18692 (AP)

K MEENA KUMARI v. THE A P STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED

WP/6986/2026 · 2026-03-29

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010124382026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6986/2026 Between: 1. K MEENA KUMARI, W/O. AGED ABOUT YEARS,WORKING AS MANAGER (STORAGE), ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., VIJAYAWADA,R/O. KANURU ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE A P STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE 10-152/1, SRI SAI TOWERS, ASHOK NAGAR, BANDAR ROAD, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA-520007, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN- CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT522238 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in not furnishing to the Petitioner the copy of the Vigilance Enquiry Report conducted pursuant to Rc.No.C.No.93/V and E/SKL I DEVI/OP.2/2025 dated 17-10-2025. along with the communications/recommendations said to have been forwarded 2 despite receipt of representation dated 24-02-2026 submit by the Petitioner requesting the same, and proposing to initiate further departmental/disciplinary action against the Petitioner without supplying the relied upon material documents, as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice and violative Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to furnish the certified copies of the Vigilance Enquiry Report and all connected material and further declare that no disciplinary or coercive action shall be initiated or proceeded with against the Petitioner on the basis of the said vigilance enquiry without furnishing such documents and affording reasonable opportunity to submit her explanation and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the 1st Respondents to initiate or proceed with any coercive or adverse action against the Petitioner pursuant to or on the basis of the Vigilance Enquiry conducted in Rc.No.C.No.93/V&E/SKL I DEVI/OP.2/2025 dated 17-10-2025, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RACHURI LAKSHMIKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II 2. 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6986 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.T.Jyothi, learned counsel representing Sri Rachuri Lakshmikar learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, as the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survives for further adjudication. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 30.03.2026 PSA