Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1869 (BOM)

JOASH CHRISTOPHER ASIR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/2612/2026 · 2026-07-07

Shri Ashwin D Bhobe

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24-WP-2612-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2612 OF 2026 Joash Christopher Asir … Petitioner Versus. The State of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents ----- Ms. Kajal Singh, for the Petitioner. Ms. Angana Sarmah, for the Respondent No. 2 Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the Respondent – State. ------- CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 7th July, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard Ms. Kajal Singh, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, Ms. Angana Sarmah, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 and Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP for the Respondent-State. 2. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is preferred by the Petitioner for quashing the FIR bearing 291 of 2024, dated 28.04.2024, registered with Bhandup Police Station, for offences punishable under Sections 279 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code (impugned FIR) and for quashing the charge- Vivekanand 1 24-WP-2612-2026.doc sheet bearing CC No.403/PS/2024, pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 53rd Court, Mulund, Mumbai. 3. Ms. Kajal Singh, learned Advocate for the Petitioner and Ms. Angana Sarmah, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 2, submit that the subject matter of the impugned FIR and the criminal proceedings is an accident involving the motorcycle ridden by the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2 pedestrian. They submit that the accident resulted from contributory negligence by both the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 2. They submit that the Respondent No. 2 sustained minor injuries in the said accident. They submit that the Petitioner assisted the Respondent No. 2 and provided her with all the required medical assistance. They submit that the Respondent No. 2 filed proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, registered as MACT Case No. 1185 of 2024, which was settled before the Lok Adalat vide Award dated 13.09.2025, in view of the amicable resolution between the parties. They submit that the Petitioner has paid the amount to the Respondent No. 2 in terms of the award. They submit that, in view of the settlement, the Respondent No. 2 has no given her no Vivekanand 2 24-WP-2612-2026.doc objection in her Affidavit. They, therefore, request the quashing of the impugned FIR and the criminal proceedings arising therefrom. 2. Petitioner is present in the Court and is represented by his Advocate, Ms. Kajal Singh. She tenders the photostat copy of the Petitioner’s Identity Card, which is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. 3. Respondent No.2 is present in the Court and is identified by her Advocate Ms. Angana Sarmah. She tenders the Photostat copy of Identity Card of Respondent No.2, which is taken on record and marked as “X-1” for identification. 4. Ms. Angana Sarmah, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2, states that the Affidavit dated 21.05.2026, affirmed by Respondent No.2 before Notary Mr. Balaji Lakhame, Mumbai, is on record (page nos. 74 to 78 of the paper book). The same is marked with “X-2” for identification. 5. Respondent No. 2, submits that Respondent No. 2 has received the compensation awarded in the proceedings before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai in MACT Case No. 1185 of 2024. She states that the accident occurred due to her lapse. She states that she has no grievance against the Petitioner. She states that she does not intend to continue the criminal proceedings and will not support the prosecution case. She relies on paragraphs Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 of her Affidavit X-2, which are reproduced verbatim. Vivekanand 3 24-WP-2612-2026.doc “3. That the parties confirm that all claims, demands, grievances and disputes arising out of the incident have been fully and finally resolved. 4. That the Petitioner has also already compensated Respondent No. 2, and both parties wish to maintain a cordial and peaceful relationship going forward. 5. Both the Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 respectfully request the Hon’ble Court to consider this mutual settlement and consent and quash FIR No. 291 of 2024 and all criminal and civil proceedings arising therefrom in the interest of justice. 6. Both parties declare that this affidavit is made voluntarily without any pressure, coercion, or undue influence, solely for the purpose of amicable settlement and quashing of proceedings.” 6. Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP for the Respondent-State, submits that since the dispute arising out of the accident has been amicably settled between the Petitioner and the Respondent No. 2, the Respondent No. 1 does not oppose the quashing of the FIR and the charge-sheet. 7. Considering the above facts, the submissions of the learned Advocates for the parties, the material on record not indicating that the Petitioner was rash and negligent while riding his motorcycle, the statement made by the Respondent No. 2 before this Court, particularly her statement that she has no grievance against the Petitioner and her no objection in her Affidavit (X-2) to the quashing of the criminal proceedings, no useful purpose will be served by allowing the criminal prosecution to continue. The Vivekanand 4 24-WP-2612-2026.doc Petitioner is a young student hence, continuation of the criminal proceedings would hamper his career. 8. Having regard to the pronouncements of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab1, Narinder Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Anr2 and Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai vs The State Of Gujarat3, there is no impediment in allowing this Petition. 9. In view of the above, this Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). Consequently, the impugned FIR and the Charge-sheet bearing CC No.403/PS/2024 are quashed. 10. Ms. Kajal Singh, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner voluntarily offers to pay an additional amount of Rs. 25,000/- to Respondent No. 2, which shall be transferred to the bank account of Respondent No. 2. 11. In view of the above, Criminal Writ Petition No.2612 of 2026 is disposed of. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) 1 2012 10 SCC 303 2 2014 6 SCC 466 3 2017 9 SCC 641 Vivekanand 5