- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 328 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. ROOPASHREE W/O KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 2. GANGAMMA W/O RAMAKRISHNAIAH H., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 3. SOUMYASHREE W/O CHANDRA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 4. MADHUSHREE D/O RAMAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS 5. KAMALAKSHI W/O MUNIKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 6. RAMAKKA W/O SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 7. SHWETHA W/O MANJUNATH Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 8. PUTTASWAMY S/O MALAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 9. PUSHPALATHA W/O REVANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 10. CHANDRABHAI W/O LATE GOVINDARAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 11. KOUSALYABHAI W/O LATE KRISHNAJI RAO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 12. SUBBAMMA W/O OBALESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 13. ANUSUYA W/O NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 14. VARDHAMMA W/O SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 15. PREMABAI W/O R GOVINDARAO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 16. SANJEEVAMMA W/O GANGARAJ AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 17. BHAGYAMMA W/O KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 18. SHIVAKUMARI D/O MALLAIAH AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS 19. JEEVITHA W/O MUNIKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS 20. NANJAMMA W/O SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 21. GAYATHRI W/O BABU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 22. HOMBAMMA W/O SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 23. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA W/O RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 24. SOUMYA K GOWDA W/O KRISHNEGOWDA J AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 25. SHOBA M H W/O RAJESH M N AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 26. SRINIVAS S/O ERAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 27. LELLAVATHI W/O SATHISH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 28. PUSHPA W/O CHANNABASAVA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 29. GEETHA W/O BABU RAO AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 30. INDIRADEVI W/O LATE DHARMARAJ THAPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 31. SAVITHRI THAPA D/O DHARMARAJ THAPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 32. SHIVAMMA W/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 33. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA W/O NARASIMHA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 34. BHARATHI W/O VEERABHADRAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 35. MANJULA BAI W/O LATE ANIL KADAM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 36. CHETAN S/O BABU AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 37. DEVI W/O RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 38. SOUMYA D/O BABU AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS 39. GOWRAMMA D/O THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 40. KAVYA SHREE D/O RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 41. YASHODHA W/O MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 42. SUJATHA W/O LAKSHMINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 43. BHUVANESHWARI W/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 44. SHRUTHI W/O HANUMANTHARAJU AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 45. ROOPA W/O SHIVAKUAMR AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 46. SHARADHAMMA W/O SHIVALINGAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 47. SAVITHA W/O SRINIVAS M AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 48. BEENA W/O MAHESH K D AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 49. SAROJAMMA W/O MASTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 50. KAMALAMMA W/O OBALESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 51. JYOTHI W/O SANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 52. GUNDAMMA W/O SUBHASH CHANDRA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 53. SAVITHA W/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 54. K JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE SHIVALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 55. LAKSHAMMA W/O PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 56. GANGALAKSHMAMMA W/O RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 57. ANUSUYAMMA W/O GANGADHARAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 58. LAKSHMAMMA W/O BYLANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 59. SHIVAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 60. MANJULA W/O DASEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 61. LATHA W/O RAVICHANDRA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 62. SUSHEELAMMA W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 63. SHANTHI W/O LATE KUMAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 64. V SHARADHA W/O V SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 65. KEMPAMMA W/O LATE KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 66. JAYAMMA W/O PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 67. MEENADEVI W/O KALLURAM AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 68. N ANU W/O RUDREGOWDA B S AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS 69. R SHANTHA W/O NAGARAJ B AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 70. GEETHA W/O NANJUNDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 71. BHAGYAMMA W/O KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 72. SUSHEELA W/O JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 73. SUSHEELA W/O N AGARAJ S AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 74. THIMMAKKA W/O GANGANARASAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 75. SUMITHRA W/O NARASIMHAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 76. BHAGYAMMA W/O SHANKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 77. SHARADHAMMA W/O K H GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 78. RATHNAMMA S R W/O VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 79. RENUKA W/O YALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS - 10 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 80. YALLAPPA S/O IRAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 81. PARVATHI BAI W/O R GOVINDARAO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 82. VEDHAVATHI W/O NAGARJA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 83. ASHRANI W/O B T DINESH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 84. D SHARADHAMMA D/O KOTTURAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 85. VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 86. PUSHPANI W/O JAGANNATH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 87. GOWRAMMA W/O VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 88. VANDANA W/O SATISH AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS - 11 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 89. NINGAMMA W/O BASAVRAJ AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 90. LAKSHAMMA D/O RAMANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 91. G PUSHAPALATHA D/O NIRANJAN R AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 92. ASHA W/O SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 93. SHAMANTH W/O RANGANATH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 94. RADHA W/O SURESH B AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 95. RAKUMI W/O HUSSAIN PIRA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 96. SUSHEELA W/O GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 97. NAGAMMA W/O MALLURAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS - 12 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 98. RAMYA W/O DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS 99. JAYALAKSHMI M W/O G V SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 100. N KAVITHA W/O JAGADHISH M AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 101. LAKSHMI W/O B M MAHESH AGED ABOUT 38YEARS 102. ASHA N W/O B NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 103. M GAYATHRI W/O SANTHOSH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 104. BANASHANKARI M W/O VIJAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 105. T S SHARADHAMMA W/O SHIVASWAMY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 106. SOUBHAGYA W/O RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS - 13 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 107. K REKHA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 108. CHANDRAMMA W/O RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 109. ANNAPOORNA W/O SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 110. LAKSHMI W/O LATE DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 111. K B MAMATHAKUMARI W/O S ANIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 112. B S MAMATHA W/O B N UMASHANKAR AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 113. SHIVAPARVATHI W/O HANUMATHARAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 114. B PARVATHI W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 115. MUNILAKSHMAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS - 14 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 116. BABURAO S/O VENKOBARAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 117. MURTHI RAO S S/O SHYAM RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 118. NAGAMMA W/O CHANNARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 119. PRABHAVATHI W/O BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 120. SAVITHA BAI W/O VIJAY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 121. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE POOJA BYLAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 122. PADMAVATHI W/O KESHAVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 123. CHOWDAMMA W/O NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 124. PREMA M S W/O NANDEESHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS - 15 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 125. K KAVITHA W/O BALARAM AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 126. KOUSALYA W/O MUNIRAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 127. YAMINI W/O AJAYA N AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 128. DEVIKA W/O VIJAYA N AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 129. VANISHREE W/O LOKESH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 130. MADHURA W/O LATE PRASAD AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 131. MAHIMA W/O RAVINDRANATH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS 132. JAYANTHI W/O RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 133. YASHODHA W/O MANJUANTHA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS - 16 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 134. RAJESHWARI M S W/O MAHESH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 135. C CHANDRAKALA W/O CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 136. PREMA W/O PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 137. SHILPASHREE W/O UMASHANKAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 138. USHA W/O KEMPARAJ AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 139. LAKSHMI W/O NATARAJ AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 140. RASHMI W/O SURESH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 141. SAVITHA W/O SATHISH BABU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 142. ASHWINI W/O SANDEEP AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS - 17 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 143. RAMYA W/O ARUN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 144. MUNILAKSHAMMA W/O SDIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 145. K ASHA W/O UMESH N AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 146. SAKAMMA W/O SUBRAVAMANNAI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 147. M ANUPAMA W/O L CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 148. ANURADHA W/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 149. BETTAMMA W/O PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 150. NETHRA W/O SHANTHARAJ AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 151. HANUMAKKA W/O GALANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS - 18 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 152. LAKSHMI W/O VENKATESH RAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 153. YASODHA BAI W/O ESHWAR RAO AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 154. REVATHI W/O THIRUMURTHESH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 155. VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O RAMESH 156. MAHALAKSHMI W/O LATE SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 157. JAYAMMA W/O NARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 158. VEDASHREE W/O ARUN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 159. NAGAVENI W/O N RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 160. NAGAMANI W/O MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 161. PINAMILAMMA - 19 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 W/O NATARAJ AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 162. T H RATHNA W/O RADHAKRISHANA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 163. JAYAMMA W/O CHANDRA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 164. JNANAKUMARI W/O NATARAJ AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 165. KAVITHA W/O KUMAR AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 166. INDIRA W/O PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 167. MALLIKAVATHI W/O RAVINDRAN AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 168. RAGINI S W/O SHANKAR NARAYANACHAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 169. GANGAMALLAMMA W/O HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 170. BHAGYAMMA W/O LATE MURTHY D B - 20 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 171. LAKSHMI W/O DEVARAJU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 172. NEELAM W/O BYLAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 173. SHOBA W/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 174. LAKSHMAMMA W/O CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 175. M S RAJESHWARI W/O RAVISH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 176. SHIVAMMA W/O BHOOTHARAJ AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 177. HEMAVATHI D/O GOVINDAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 178. SUJATHA W/O KALACHARI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 179. GEETHA S W/O MALLIKARJUNA KOTE AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS - 21 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 180. JAYALAKSHMI W/O RAMACHANDRA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS PETITIONER NOS. 1 TO 180 ARE RESIDING AT DODDABIDURU KALLU NAGASANDRA POST YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 073. 181. KARNATAKA DALITHA AMBEDKAR SANGARSHA SAMITHI REGD NO 19/1 6TH CROSS N H COLONY SUBEDARPALYA YESHWANTHAPUR BENGALURU - 560022 REPRESENTED BY ITS FOUNDER PRESIDENT H RAMAKRISHNAIAH …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH P H.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOUSING DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 22 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. ASHRAYA URBAN SCHEME COMMITTEE RAJAJESHWARINAGAR BENGALURU - 560098 REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. 5. RAJIV GANDHI HOUSING COPORATION LIMITED CAUVERY BHAWANA 9TH FLOOR, C AND F BLOCK K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. REP BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH RAYAPPA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SMT. SHILPA RANI .,ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE RESOLUTION DATED 07.01.2021 VIDE ANNX-Q ISSUED BY THE R-5 COMMITTEE HOLDING THE SAME IS ILLEGAL AND AGAINST LAW AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 23 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 ORAL ORDER This petition is filed seeking quash of resolution dated 07.01.2021 as per Annexure-Q issued by the respondent No.5- Committee. 2. Case of the petitioners is that they are the aspirants of allotment of residential sites and that it is at their instance and the persistent follow-ups, four acres of land in Sy.No.64 of Doddabidrekallu Village, Yeswantpura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk was reserved for formation of residential sites to be allotted under Ashraya Scheme. Since the said scheme was not implemented, petitioners had earlier approached this Court in writ petition in W.P.Nos.52915/2016-53296-53475/2016 for necessary directions. That this Court had disposed of the said writ petition by order dated 06.10.2016, issuing certain directions to the respondent-authorities to take necessary steps to implement the scheme expeditiously. 4. Things stood thus, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned resolution came to be passed changing the entire scheme which was initially conceptualized - 24 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 thereby depriving the legitimate expectation of the petitioners. Hence the petition. 5. Learned AGA on the other hand submits that the scheme had to be varied/altered/withdrawn in the light of certain factual aspects of the matter namely the aspirants were not locals; that the land reserved was only measuring 4 acres, which could not have been accommodated to all the aspirants; that the scheme was also proposed to be altered by constructing multi-storied residential complex to meet/allot the built-up area to as many aspirants as possible in view of the shortage of land. Thus, he submits, no error or illegality can be found in the resolution passed by the respondent-authorities. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.6, supplementing the submissions made by learned AGA, submits that in the light of unending demand for the urban residential accommodation and the shortage of land, the only option available is to explore the possibility of vertical development of the real estate, which if approved, would be implemented at the hands of respondent No.6. 7. Heard and perused the records. - 25 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 8. There is no denial of the fact that the list of aspirants for residential accommodation across the country is endless. What is not available is the proportionate extent of land area to meet the ever growing demand. 9. This Court on several occasions dealing with the identical complex situation of the matter had directed the respondent-State and its statutory bodies to explore the possibilities of implementing a scheme in the nature of multi- storied residential accommodation to cater to the never ending demand of the urban and rural residential accommodation. The impugned resolution at page No.4 records the following: "ಾನ ಅಧರು ಾತಾಡುಾ, ಯಶವಂತಪರ ಾನಸಾ ೇತ ಾಯ ! ಸುಾರು 15000ಕೂ$ %ೆಚು' ವಸ( ರ)ತ ಫ+ಾನುಭಗಳ/ ಾಸಾ0ದು2, ಲಂ4ಕೃತ ಬಹುಮಹ9 ಕಟ;ಡಗಳನು< =>?@ದ2ಲ!. ಇನೂ< %ೆB'ನ ಸಂCೆಯ ! ಅಹ? ಫ+ಾನುಭಗDಗೂ ಸಹ ವಸ(ಯನು< ಕ EಸಬಹುFಾ0ರುತFೆ ಎಂಬುFಾ0 ಸೆHೆ (D@Fಾಗ ಸೆಯ ! %ಾಜJದ2 Kೕ .ಆM. ರNೕO ಾನ ಾನ ಪJಷQ ಸದಸರು ಾತಾಡುಾ ಅಧರು ಸೂB@ರುವ Rೕಜೆಯು ತುಂSಾ ಒUೆVಯ %ಾಗೂ ಅತುತಮ RೕಜೆWಾ0ದು2, ಸದJ Rೕಜೆಯನು< ಅನುXಾYನHೊD@ದ2 ! ನಗರ ಪFೇಶದ !ನ ವ ಬಡವರ %ಾಗೂ =ಗ?(ಕJHೆ ವಸ( ಕ Eಸುವ Sೇ9Zೆಗಳನು< ಈ\ೇJಸದಂಾಗುತFೆ %ಾಗೂ ನಗರ ಪFೇಶದ ಾಸRೕಗ ಭೂ>ಯ Nೕ ನ ಒತಡಗಳನು< ಕ9NHೊDಸಲು ಲಂ4ೕಕೃತ (Vertical) ಬಹುಮಹ9 ಕಟ;ಡಗಳ =ಾ?ಗಳ Rೕಜೆ ಅತಂತ ಸಹZಾJWಾ0ರುತFೆ ಎಂದು (Dಸುಾ ಸದJ Rೕಜೆ ಅನುXಾYನZೆ$ ಸಹಮತ ವಕಪ9@ದರು. ತದನಂತರ ಾನ ಅಧರು ಾತಾಡುಾ Fೊಡ]^ದರಕಲು! Hಾಮದ ಸೇ? ನಂ.64ರ 4 ಎಕ_ೆ ಜ>ೕ=ನ ! ಲಂ4ೕಕೃತ (Vertical) ಬಹುಮಹ9 ಕಟ;ಡವನು< =>?ಸಲು - 26 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 ಸೆಯ ! ಸಾ?ನುಮತ`ಂದ =ಣ?ಯವನು< ZೈHೊಳV+ಾcತು %ಾಗೂ ಸದJ ಸdಳವನು< _ಾeೕf Hಾಂg ವಸ( =ಗಮZೆ$ ಹhಾಂತJಸಲು ಅಗತ ಕಮ ZೈHೊಳ/Vವಂೆ ಸೂBಸ+ಾcತು. Nೕಲ$ಂಡಂೆ ಸೆಯ ! =ಣ?c@ರುವಂೆ ಅಗತ ಕಮವ)ಸಲು %ಾಗೂ ಸದJ ಸೆಯ ಸಾ ನಡವDಯನು< ಾನ ಉಚ' ಾWಾಲಯದ ಅವHಾಹೆHೆ ಸ !ಸಲು ಸೂBಸುಾ ಸೆಯನು< ವಂದೆಗUೆjಂ`Hೆ ಮುZಾಯHೊDಸ+ಾcತು". 10. In the light of the aforesaid factual aspect of the matter and the resolution passed by the respondent-authorities is to construct multi-storied residential complex to meet the demand, this Court do not find it appropriate to interfere with a proposal sought to be implemented by the respondent- authorities. 11. Having said that, it is also necessary to note that this Court in its earlier order dated 06.10.2016 and 04.06.2019 had repeatedly directed the respondent-Authority to implement the project and to consider the request of the petitioners expeditiously. 12. In other words, the respondent-Authority is expected to formulate, implement and execute the scheme. Now that the respondent-authorities have come out with a proposal of vertical development of the real estate to accommodate as - 27 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25657 WP No. 328 of 2022 many aspirants as possible, respondent-authorities shall proceed with the same. 13. At this juncture, except hoping the expeditious action at the ends of the Government, no specific directions can be issued. However, it is made clear if in the event of the respondent-Authorities implementing the project of multi- storied complex, the applications of the petitioners herein shall be considered on priority in accordance with law, if they otherwise satisfy the conditions of allotment. 14. With the above observation, petition is disposed of. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12