Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18685 (JHR)

SURAJ KUMAR BHUIYAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6124/2026 · 2026-07-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19327] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6124 of 2026 ------ Suraj Kumar Bhuiyan, aged about 24 years, son of Late Tapeshwar Bhuiyan, resident of Village Nenti, P.O.- Bahera, P.S.- Piparwar, District:- Chatra. (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-02-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Piparwar P.S. Case No.15 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 317 (2), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 25 (1-B) (a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an extremist organization namely T.S.P.C. and from the petitioner and the co-accused persons, various arms and extremist leaflets have been recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that charge- sheet has already been submitted in this case. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-22 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except Piparwar P.S. Case No.12 of 2026, the petitioner is not involved in any other case. It is next submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.4864 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.03.2026 as has been mentioned in para-24 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Chatra in connection with Piparwar P.S. Case No.15 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-02.07.2026-Animesh/