SURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/10026/2026 · 2026-05-20
Aman Chaudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18681 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18681 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 136+267
CRM-M-10026-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision: 20.05.2026 SURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER
... Petitioners
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. AS Jawandha, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ravneet Singh Lekhi, AAG, Punjab.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned State counsel refers to status report and submits that there are 4 more affected persons who had not made party respondents.
2.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh with better particulars after impleading the affected parties.
3.
Ordered accordingly.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) 20.05.2026
JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.05.20 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document