- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25712 WP No. 13492 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 13492 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT M A JAYALAKSHMI W/O CHANNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESIDING AT NARASIMHAYYANADODDI, GIRENAHALLI POST, HAROHALLI HOBLI AND TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562160. PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHOKA T.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY PRINICPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA - 562159. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION, RAMANAGARA - 562159. 4. THE TAHSILDAR HAROHALLI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562160. 5. SRI GURUMURTHY S/O LATE NARASAPPA, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25712 WP No. 13492 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NARASIMHAYYANADODDI, GIRENAHALLI POST, HAROHALLI HOBLI AND TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562160. 6. REVENUE INSPECTOR HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 562160. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE. N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4 AND R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER ORDER/DIRECTION TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 15.07.2025 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 (ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER) IN CASE NO. RRT/DISP/226/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and 6. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the endorsement dated 18.12.2025 (Annexure-K) issued by - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25712 WP No. 13492 of 2026 respondent No.3 to change of entry in the revenue records in terms of the registered sale deed referred to in the endorsement at Annexure-K. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, respondent No.3 has declined to interfere with the plea made by the petitioner as to change of katha in respect of the subject land is concerned. The petitioner is having an efficacious remedy to approach respondent No.2 under the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach respondent No.2. All contentions of the parties are kept open. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PNV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30