Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18675 (RAJ)

ARJUN ALIAS GANJA S/O SHRI SEHDEV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11298/2025 · 2026-01-16

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1954] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11298/2025 Arjun Alias Ganja S/o Shri Sehdev, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No 10 Sivani Police Station Sivani District Bhiwani Haryana. (At Present Accused Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 16/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.87/2023 registered at Police Station Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu for the offences punishable under Sections 332, 353, 307, 224 & 394 of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 332, 353, 224, 307, 395 & 397 of IPC and Section 7/27(2) of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that no person has sustained any injury in this case. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. Learned counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 29.03.2023 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2026:RJ-JP:1954] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11298/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that there is serious allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that one other case has been registered against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, as also considering the fact that no person has sustained any injury; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Arjun Alias Ganja S/o Shri Sehdev, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /10