Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18675 (BOM)

MANRAJ RAMESH KSHIRSAGAR v. SUJATA SANDEEP GHADIGAONKAR

CRA/542/2026 · 2026-10-13

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16-CRA-542-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 542 OF 2026 Manraj Ramesh Kshirsagar & Anr ..Applicants Versus Sujata Sandeep Ghadigaonkar & Anr …Respondents Mr. Deepak S Devkar, for the Applicants. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 13th OCTOBER 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Deepak Devkar, the learned Counsel for the Applicants. 2. The challenge in this Application is to an order passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court on 18th July 2026. In paragraph 6 of the impugned order, the learned Judge has recorded that the suit appears to have been properly valued and that the Plaintiff has shown readiness to pay deficit Court fees, if eventually the Court comes to the conclusion that the suit claim was not correctly valued and proper Court fees has not been paid. 3. Mr. Devkar, the learned Counsel for the Applicants, submits that the trial Court has now posted the matter for passing order on an application for judgment on admission. ARS 1/2 ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Digitally signed by ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2026.10.14 15:01:23 +0530 16-CRA-542-2026.DOC 4. In any event, the trial Court shall in conformity with the observations in paragraph 6 of the impugned order decide the aspect as to whether the suit claim has been correctly valued and proper Court fee has been paid thereon while deciding the suit or passing a judgment on admission. 5. Subject to the aforesaid clarification, the Application stands disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] ARS 2/2