Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18674 (JHR)

SATISH PRAJAPATI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6072/2026 · 2026-07-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19383] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6072 of 2026 ------ Satish Prajapati, aged about – 30 years, S/o- Sri Budhan Prajapati, R/o- Village- Napokala, P.O. – Gosai Balia, P.S. – Badkagaon, Dist.- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-02-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 142 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of theft of motorcycle. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been remanded in this case from Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026 on the basis of the confessional statement made in that case and the recovery of stolen motorcycle. It is also submitted that charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.04.2026 as is evident from para-9 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.J.C.M., Hazaribagh in connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 142 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 02.07.2026 Saroj/