Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1867 (AP)

PUSTELA RAJA RAVINDRA NATH v. V. KRISHNA TEJA MYLAVARAPU, IAS

CC/139/2026 · 2026-04-05

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010009712026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 139 OF 2026 Between: 1. PUSTELA RAJA RAVINDRA NATH, S/o. late. P. Elisha, aged 34 years, Occ Junior Assistant, O/o District Panchayat Officer, Nandyal, presently working in Divisional Panchayat Officer Nandyal on Deputation, R/o H.No 4-210-3 Shilpa singapoor Township, Dinnedevarapadu Village,Kurnool Mandal Kurnool District - 518 002 ...Petitioner AND 1. V KRISHNA TEJA MYLAVARAPU IAS, The Commissioner, Panchayath Raj and Rural Development, PVS Icon Building Tadepalli Guntur District - 522 501. 2. Smt Rajakumari Ganiya IAS, The Collector and District Magistrate, Andhra Pradesh, Nandyal District-518 501. 3. 3. Smt K Lalitha Bai, The District Panchayat Officer, Andhra Pradesh, Nandyal District-518 501. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the Respondents herein and punish the Respondents for willfully 2 disobeying the orders of this Honble court made in WP.No.30151 of 2025, dated 11.11.2025, passed by this Honble Court, under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: GULIVINDALA VANITHASREE Counsel for the Respondents: G RAJU The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Contempt Case No.139 of 2026 O R DE R: When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents, that the orders of this Court in W.P. No. 30151 of 2025, dated 11.11.2025, were complied with and no further orders are required in the Contempt Case. 2. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this case shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 06.04.2026 eha 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY C.C.No.139/2026 Dt. 06.04.2026 eha