Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18669 (JHR)

PRAKASH OROAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6046/2026 · 2026-07-01

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19251 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6046 of 2026 Praksh Oraon, aged about 21 years, S/o- Ravi Oraon … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Praful Jojo, APP --- 02/01.07.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.12.2025 in connection with S.T. No. 159 of 2026, corresponding to G.R. No. 452 of 2026 arising out of Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 640 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 81 of BNS and the charge has been framed under Section 69 of the BNS pending in the court of learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner-XVII, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner aged about 21 years is having no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 13.12.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the first information report and has submitted that as per the allegation the victim is aged 26 years and is a married lady. As per the allegation, there was consensual relationship between the petitioner and the victim in the pretext of marriage and subsequently the petitioner switched off his mobile and the case was filed. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of the first information report itself, is not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there appears to be some element of 2026:JHHC:19251 2 consensual relationship between the petitioner and the victim and also considering the custody of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner-XVII, Ranchi in connection with S.T. No. 159 of 2026, corresponding to G.R. No. 452 of 2026 arising out of Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 640 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 01.07.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-03.07.2026