[2026:RJ-JP:3936] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5133/2025 1. Satyajit Singh S/o Man Bahadur Singh, Age 30 years, R/o Plot No. A-36, Gopal Nagar, Sirsi Road, Meenawala, Panchyawala, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302034. 2. Karan Vijay Singh S/o Rajendra Singh, Age 38 years, R/o Udaipurkund, Ajmer, Rajasthan- 305802. 3. Gopal Singh Rathore S/o Prahlad Singh Rathore, Age 38 Years, R/o 72, Rajputo Ka Bas, Rasliyawas, Nagaur, Rajasthan- 341510. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through P.P. 2. Shiv Shankar Rajvanshi S/o Late Shri Badrinarayan Sharma, R/o 200, Padmavati Colony, B-Block, Nirman Nagar, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan, India. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gautam Bhadadra For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Yash Takhar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.295/2025 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 304(2), 324(2), 333, 329(3), 329(4) & 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. [2026:RJ-JP:3936] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-5133/2025] 2. The petitioner No.3 and complainant-respondent No.2 are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide order dated 21.08.2025, interim protection was granted to the petitioners by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Counsel submits that during the pendency of this petition, the dispute has been resolved between the parties by way of an amicable settlement. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The settlement agreement has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise and submits that complainant has no objection if the present criminal misc. petition is allowed. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the respective parties, the material made available for perusal, especially considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. [2026:RJ-JP:3936] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-5133/2025] 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.295/2025 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan), along with subsequent proceedings is hereby quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /289