SANJEEV KUMAR S/O SHRI INDRAJ SINGH v. MR. BHASKAR A. SAWANT
CCP/940/2025 · 2026-01-20
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18662 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18662 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2456] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.940/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5763/2025 Sanjeev Kumar S/o Shri Indraj Singh, aged about 49 years, R/o 1/205 Royal Greens Apartment, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Mr. Bhaskar A. Sawant, Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Dr. Krishna Kant Pathak, The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sharma, The Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. State of Rajasthan through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents/Contemnors For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, AAAG on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 20/01/2026
1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of order dated 22.05.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5763/2025, where the petition was decided in the light of earlier order dated 07.05.2024 passed in the case of
[2026:RJ-JP:2456] (2 of 2) [CCP-940/2025] Raghuveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20358/2018.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents has placed one order dated 27.08.2025 before this Court with the contention that the judgment of Raghuveer Singh (supra) and so many other judgments having contrary view with the ratio laid down in the case of Raghuveer Singh (supra), have been referred to the Larger Bench vide order dated 27.08.2025 passed in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.591/2025.
3. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to revive the same after judgment of the reference in the aforesaid case, in case, the judgment is delivered in favour of the petitioner.
4. Hence, the present contempt petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/81