GUDUTHULA LALITHA SANKAR VARA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/7458/2026 · 2026-03-17
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18661 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18661 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010117612026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 7458/2026 Between:
1. GUDUTHULA LALITHA SANKAR VARA PRASAD, S/O G.CHANDRA RAO, OCC PRIVTAE SERVICES , AGED 32 R/O D.NO.2-100/10, SANTHI NAGAR, AGANAMPUDI
VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, AP
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION VISAKHAPATNAM , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. YASWANTH GADE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents more particularly 3rd respondent in not conducting investigationin FIR No. 323 of 2024 Dt. 30-10-2024 on the file of the 3rd respondent Police Station and not filing final report as required u/s 193 of the BNSS as highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of article 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent police station to conduct proper and fair investigation in FIR No. 323 of 2024 Dt. 30-10-2024 on its file as ecpeditiously as possible with in the tinne frame and file final report in the said cases…”
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr.G.Yaswanth, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that Mr. G. Yaswanth, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that though FIR No.323 of 2024 dated 30.10.2024 was registered on the file of the Respondent No.3 Police Station, the Respondent No.3 has failed to conduct any investigation and has not filed the final report as mandated under law. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that after completion of thorough investigation in FIR No.323 of 2024 dated 30.10.2024, the Charge Sheet has been filed and the case has been taken on file as C.C. No. 675 of 2026 on 06.03.02026. 5. Considering the above submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of, as the purpose for filing the Writ Petition is already sub-served.
However, if the petitioner feels that the investigation has not been conducted on proper lines, as submitted, he is at liberty to file a private complaint under Section 190 read with Section 200 of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’ / Section 210 read with 223 of ‘the BNSS’. 3
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 18.03.2026 PRA
4
101 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 7458 of 2026
Date: 18.03.2026 PRA