Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25602 RSA No. 1031 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1031 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. RAMAKRISHNA S/O LATE SRI. POTTARAMANCHAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O KENNALU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI PANDAVAPURA TALUK DISTRICT-571435.
MANDYA DISTRICT. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S.M. BABU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. ESHWARAIAH S/O LATE SRI POTTARAMANCHAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/O KENNALU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI PANDAVAPURA TALUK DISTRICT-571435.
MANDYA DISTRICT.
2.
SMT. CHIKKARASAMMA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS W/O SRI.CHALUVAIAH R/O BALLAKERE VILLAGE K.R.PETE TALUK-571426.
3.
SMT. SANNAMMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O SRI.KALAPPA
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25602 RSA No. 1031 of 2017
R/O KYATHAMAANAHALLI MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-570001.
4.
SMT. MAHADEVAMMA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O SRI.NANJUNDAPPA R/O BASTHIPURA VILLAGE BELAGOLA HOBLI, SRIRANGAPATANA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571438.
5.
SMT. JALAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS W/O SRI.THIMMAIAH R/O BELIEKERE VILLAGE NOW R/AT KENNALU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571435.
6.
SMT. SAKAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS W/O LATE SRI.RAVALAIAH R/AT BEHIND COURT SRIRANGAPATNA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571438.
7.
SMT. RANAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O LATE SRI.HONGAIAH R/O BALLEKERE VILLAGE SANTHEBACHAHALLI HOBLI K.R.PET TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571426. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 [ABSENT];
R3, R4 AND R5 ARE SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.02.2016 PASSED IN RA NO.19/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., PANDAVAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25602 RSA No. 1031 of 2017
AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.08.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.279/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, PANDAVAPURA, TRIAL COURT DECREED THE SUIT. APPELLATE COURT DISMISSED THE APPEAL. THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT A memo dated 02.06.2026 is filed by the learned counsel for appellant stating that the sole appellant is reported to have died on 27.09.2023 and despite best efforts, he could not get further details of the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant.
2. Accordingly, placing the memo on record, the appeal stands dismissed as abated.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
NBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4