Mohammadiya Educational Society v. Medical Council of India
WP/19641/2014 · 2026-01-26
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18657 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18657 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010120182014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 19641/2014 Between:
1. MOHAMMADIYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MR. JAVVAD AHMED QURESHI, RAMARAJUPALLY, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. FATHIMA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,, MOHAMMADIYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY & CORRESPONDENT, MR. JAVVAD AHMED QURESHI, RAMARAJUPALLY, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. MR. JAVVAD AHMED QURESHI,, S/O. LATE A.Q. JEELANI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RAMARAJUPALLY, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BOCKET-15, SECTOR -A, DARAKA PHASE 1, NEW DELHI 110077.
2. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
3. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, MEDICAL, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.
4. NTR UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus", declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing proceedings dated 28.05.2014 in denying and rejecting renewal of permission of the 5th batch of 100 MBBS students as under section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, for the academic year 2014-15 of the 2nd petitioner college, notwithstanding the compliances made by the Petitioners as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and regulations made thereunder and consequently set aside the same and further direct the Respondents herein to grant the renewal permission to the 2nd petitioner institution for all purposes for the academic year 2014-15 and pass such other
order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 24593 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith reconsider and grant immediate renewal of permission for the 2nd petitioner institution to admit the 5d1 Batch of 100 MBBS Students for the academic year 2014-15 before the 15h day of July 2014 and enable the 2nd petitioner institution to take admissions for the academic year 2014-15 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. OMAR A PASHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW(AP) The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITON NO.19641 OF 2014
ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the petitioner(s). Heard learned counsel for the respondents.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the docket order reveals that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 22.01.2026 and
learned counsel for the respondents submitted that cause in the present writ petition does not survive. Hence, the matter is directed to be listed on 27.01.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents reiterated that since the subject matter relates to granting of permission to the intake for 100 MBBS admissions to the 2nd petitioner for the academic year 2014-15, due to paucity of time, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous.
4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 27.01.2026 BSP
27
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.19641 of 2014
27.01.2026 BSP