Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18653 (JHR)

SOMNATH KUMAR MAHTO ALIAS SOMNATH MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6118/2026 · 2026-07-02

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19338 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6118 of 2026 Somnath Kumar Mahto@ Somnath Mahto, aged about 40 years, S/o Late Kouleshwar Mahto … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishnupad Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, APP --- 04/02.07.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.06.2025 in connection with Daru P.S Case No. 65 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1758 of 2025 with reference to S.T. Case No. 361 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 75(2), 76, 64(2), 62, 303(2), 351(2), 109(1) of the BNS, 2023 pending in the court of learned Additional Session Judge-IX, Hazaribagh. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there is direct and specific allegation of committing rape against the petitioner upon the victim and the motorcycle and other materials have been recovered from the place of occurrence. The victim has also supported the allegation made against the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is direct and specific allegation made against the petitioner who is named in the FIR of committing forceful sexual assault against the victim, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 2026:JHHC:19338 2 6. The instant bail application is hereby rejected. 7. Let a copy of this be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 02.07.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-03.07.2026