IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36595 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== 1. Sukhram Yadav, S/o Bachcha Yadav, 2. Rabindra Yadav @ Raben S/o Sita Ram Yadav Both are R/o Village - Koriyapatti, Ward No. 5, P.O. - Debipur, P.S.- Raghopur, Dist. - Supaul. ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shreekant Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 16-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Both accused/petitioners are named in the FIR and apprehending their arrest in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.281 of 2025 registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 132, 324(5), 326(f), 326(g), 303(2) and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNS’). 3. Allegation against petitioners is to set ablaze the house of one Surjit Sada and also looted the mobile and other house-hold items along with 18 named accused persons and 20-25 unknown accused persons. The present Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36595 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/3 occurrence took place while protest made by minorities of the locality, suspecting that the victim persons were involved in the occurrence. The informant is the S.H.O. of Raghopur Police Station. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for petitioners that as to ablaze and vandalizing the house of one Surjit Sada is appearing very very much general and omnibus against the petitioners. It is pointed out that on the basis of hearsay input received by local choukidar, both petitioners were implicated with present crime in question. Both petitioners claimed clean antecedent. 5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail. 6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as the allegation raised through FIR is appearing very much general and omnibus in nature against both petitioners, who are of clean antecedent, coupled with the fact that their implication also prima facie appears out of suspicion raised by local choukidar, accordingly, both petitioners, above-named, are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36595 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 3/3 below within a period of four weeks, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, Supaul in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No.281 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Sanjeet/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) U T