Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2026 DAILYLAW 18651 (PNJ)
SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/20505/2026 · 2026-05-14
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18651 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18651 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-20505-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.230 CRM-M-20505-2026 Decided on : 14.05.2026 Sunil Kumar @ Sunil
...... Petitioner
Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM :
*** Present : Mr. Arun Kumar Singal, Advocate for the petitioner.
. Sh. Sube S.Kaushik, Advocate for the complainant. ***
, J (ORAL)
! "
# # $%$
&
'()"%$ %% $%$*
%+,-.*,$-. ,-. ,$-.
*, - !" $%$ /# $ ! / 0 # # / 1 /0 # / / '() 2 & / MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-20505-2026 2 0 3 # & 1 & & 2 0 / / 0 /# /&& 0 # 0 " & / 4 %% $%$* 4 / 5 5 & / * 0 & 6/ &/ 0 # /
0 & &# & & 4 & 0 2 0 0 # / & & &/ // & However, she has not controverted the fact that the petitioner is first time offender as he is not involved in any other case.
* 2 / / / 0 # 0 & / & MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-20505-2026 3 7 / % % / %$ 5 5 / 5 5 & / 5 * 0 & 6/ / # / 0 & & 0 & 0 & $ 8 ( 9 ) 1 / :& / 8 0 :& 68 # / && & / /
& $ 8 ( ( 0 & 0 & & & & . & 8 . .8; ( & 6 / // Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No < & => ." MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-20505-2026 4 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh