p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 901 of 2026 Anjali Nayak @ Ranju and others …. Petitioners Mr. P.K. Nanda, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. M.K. Mohanty, ASC Mr. P.R.Chhatoi, Advocate for the informant CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 16.03.2026 02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Instant petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed seeking pre-arrest bail of the petitioners in connection with C.T. Case No.67 of 2026 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C. (II), Bhubaneswar arising out of Mancheswar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026 on the grounds stated. 3. Perused the FIR as at Annexure-1. The case diary is produced and the same is gone through. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused persons belong to one family and the alleged excess has been committed by them in course of events and it all happen suddenly. It is claimed that petitioner No.2 has caused injuries by means of a brick. The medical examination report of the injured, namely, Nirmal Jagadeb is produced and the same is also perused. The said p. 2 report reveals the victim to have suffered multiple abrasions and a fracture on left hand. The medical prescriptions of the injured have been produced by learned counsel for the informant in course of hearing. It is alleged that the informant is having antecedents and hence of criminal back ground and the alleged incident has happened for the informant having parked his vehicle Infront of the house of the petitioners. Recorded the submission of learned counsel for the State. Gone through the case diary and statement of the witnesses recorded under Section 180 BNSS. As it appears, for the parking of a vehicle, the alleged occurrence has taken place but the victim received multiple injuries allegedly claimed to be in the hands of petitioner No.2. Considering the above facts and submissions of learned counsels for the respective parties and that the victim above named received injuries and fracture, this Court is not inclined to consider plea of pre-arrest bail to any of the petitioners but is of the view release of petitioner Nos.1 and 3 who are the parents of the other two accused persons should be directed upon their surrender before the learned court below imposing stringent conditions leaving it open for petitioner Nos.2 and 4 to surrender before the court concerned seeking regular bail. 4. Accordingly, it is ordered. 5. In the result, the ABLAPL is disposed of with the direction as aforesaid. In the event, the petitioners surrender p. 3 before the court of learned J.M.F.C. (II), Bhubaneswar within a fortnight from today, it is directed that petitioner Nos.1 and 3 shall be released on bail in connection with C.T. Case No.67 of 2026 corresponding to Mancheswar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/-(rupees twenty five thousand) each with one solvent surety for the like amount each with such other conditions imposed by the court concerned as deemed just and proper and in the facts and circumstances of the case and petitioner Nos.2 and 4 to move regular bail which shall be entertained by learned court below during the first hour and in case of rejection, for them to approach the Sessions Court for orders on the same day itself. 6. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Rojina Designation: Junior Stenographer