2026:JHHC:9404 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 419 of 2026 Bhuneswar Beldar, S/o Prasadi Beldar, aged about 41 years, R/o: Sahana Pahari, P.O. & P.S.- Jharia, District-Dhanbad. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradyumna Poddar, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Advocate --- 05/02.04.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.07.2025 in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 1920 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 wherein cognizance has been taken under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the court of learned JM 1st Class, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner. There is neither any recovery from the possession of the petitioner nor the petitioner has been put for TIP. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted the charge has not yet been framed. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the petitioner has four criminal antecedents. However, it is not in dispute that neither there is any recovery from the possession of the petitioner nor the petitioner has put for TIP. 5. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that two co-accused namely Chhotu Singh and Bhola Singh @ Manish 2026:JHHC:9404 2 Kumar @ Manish Shankar Kumar Singh have been enlarged on bail by the District Court in B.P. No. 644 of 2025 vide order dated 10.11.2025. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is neither any recovery from the possession of the petitioner nor the petitioner has been put for TIP, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 1920 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 02.04.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-03.04.2026