Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18649 (AP)

Dagumati Anasuyamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6348/2026 · 2026-03-05

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010118642026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6348/2026 Between: 1. DAGUMATI ANASUYAMMA,, D/O BADE PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O D.NO. NADUMA STREET, VENKATRAVUPALLI, ATMAKUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524001. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ATMAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524322. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ATMAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524322 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners agricultural land with an extent of Ac.2.28 cents comprised in Sy.no. 205-3 and another 2 BKM,J W.P.No.6348 of 2026 extent of Ac.0.69 cents in Sy.no.205-1 of Atmakur Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from their agricultural land with an extent of Ac.2.28 cents comprised in Sy.no. 205-3 and another extent of Ac.0.69 cents in Sy.no.205-1 of Atmakur Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from their agricultural land with an extent of Ac.2.28 cents comprised in Sy.no. 205-3 and another extent of Ac.0.69 cents in Sy.no.205-1 of Atmakur Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District without following due process of law in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 BKM,J W.P.No.6348 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s agricultural land with an extent of Ac.2.28 cents comprised in Sy.No.205-3 and another extent of Ac.0.69 cents in Sy.No.205-1 of Atmakur Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 06.03.2026 submits that the notice was issued as per the procedure on the complaint filed by one Mr. Pathapati Vinod Kumar S/o. Venkateswarlu vide application No.FSNV012600903347 to conduct survey of the subject land. The land to an extent of Ac.6.00 cents in Sy.No.205 of Atmakur Village is classified as Government dry dotted as per the RSR of the Village. In the present adangal the name of Dagumati Anasuyamma W/o. Siva Kota Reddy is noted as pattadar and enjoyer with Khata No.1828. The notice was issued as per the procedure on the application filed by Sri Pathapati Vinod Kumar S/o. Venkateswarlu vide application No.FSNV012600903347 to conduct survey of the subject land. Till now, the 4th respondent has not initiated any steps to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land. In case it requires, due procedure will be followed. 4 BKM,J W.P.No.6348 of 2026 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law and the above said survey, if any, shall be completed in accordance with law. The said written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 06.03.2026 shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 06.03.2026 PGT