- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26159 RSA No. 1269 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1269 OF 2022 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI. CHIKKEGOWDA S/O SRI. NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/O CHOTTANAHALLI VILLAGE, BINDIGANAVILE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 432. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR B N, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI C. T. RAMESHA S/O. SRI. THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 2. SRI C. T. MUDALAGIRIGOWDA S/O SRI THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3. SRI THIMMEGOWDA S/O SRI NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 4. SRI CHIKKEGOWDA S/O. SRI. NARASIMHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, SRI NINGEGOWDA S/O SRI DODDEGOWDA, SINCE DEAD REP. THROUGH HIS LRS., Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26159 RSA No. 1269 of 2022 5. SRI SOMASHEKAR, S/O LATE SRI. NINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 6. SRI NARAYANGOWDA S/O SRI. NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 7. SRI GIRIGOWDA S/O SRI. NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 8. SRI MUDALAGIRIGOWDA S/O SRI. NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 9. SMT LAKSHMAMMA D/O SRI. NANJEGOWDA, W/O SRI. RAJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 9 ARE R/O CHOTTANAHALLI VILLAGE, BINDIGANAVILE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432. 10. SMT KEMPAMMA D/O. SRI. NANJEGOWDA, W/O. SRI. RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. LALANAKERE VILLAGE, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 432. 11. SRI THIMME GOWDA S/O MUDDE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/AT CHOTTANAHALLI BINDIGANAVILE HOBLI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26159 RSA No. 1269 of 2022 NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT- 571 432 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE , AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.12.2008 PASSED IN RA NO.61/2006 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN), AND JMFC, NAGAMANGALA., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 1.07.2003 PASSED IN O.S.NO.15/2001 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN) AND JMFC, NAGMANGALA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Case called twice. None present on behalf of the appellant. 2. The co-ordinate Bench of this Court, by the Order dated 06.01.2026 imposed cost of Rs.2,000/- payable to Advocates’ Welfare Fund, Bengaluru, within a period of one week. When the said order was not complied, request made on behalf of the appellant was acceded and time for compliance was extended by two more weeks subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to the Bengaluru Professionals Benevolent Fund. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26159 RSA No. 1269 of 2022 4. The office has noted that acknowledgments are not filed for having paid the cost of Rs.2,000/- imposed on 06.01.2026 and cost of Rs.5,000/- imposed on 19.02.2026 and further noted that the office objections are not complied. 5. This appeal is of the year 2022. The subject matter of the appeal is injunction decree challenged by defendant No.2. 6. Taking note of the same, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25