[2026:JHHC:19381] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6133 of 2026 ------ Arbind Kumar Yadav aged about 43 year, son of Mathura Yadav, resident of village- Singho, P.O.- Gumgi, P.S.- Tisri, District- Giridih, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Sushma Aind, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-02-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant and his father by causing injury to them with beer bottle, knife, iron rod, throwing bricks and stones. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and the specific allegation is against the co-accused - Sujit Kumar of attacking with knife blow upon the informant and Bhola Yadav of causing injury on the head of the informant with beer bottle. It is also submitted that the co-accused Bhola Yadav, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 24.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.5739 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.05.2026 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Pachamba P.S. Case No. 46 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 02.07.2026 Saroj/