Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18647 (AP)

Murapala Harischandra Rao v. Pathuri Madhu Babu

CRP/5715/2011 · 2026-02-18

Balaji Medamalli

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010117132011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5715/2011 Between: 1. MURAPALA HARISCHANDRA RAO, S/O. LATE APPANNA ESM, R.R.I, CABIN SOUTH, EAST COAST RAILWAY, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. PATHURI MADHU BABU, S/O. SIVA RAMA KRISHNAYYA R/O. D.NO. MIG.39, ALAKANANDA COLONY, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. SMT MURAPAL SATYAVATHI, W/O. HARISCHANDRA RAO R/O. GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. MURAPALA ANANDA, S/O. HARISCHANDRA RAO R/O. GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM (RESP.NO.2 & 3 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CRPMP 8040 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of executing the order passed in EP.No. 120/2011 in OS.No.370/2007 on 2 the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, pending disposal of the CRP in this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T V SRI DEVI The Court made the following: 3 Order: There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that E.P. No. 120 of 2011 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram was closed and, upon verification of the e-Courts records, the said E.P. was closed on 04.02.2012. 3. In view of the same, nothing further survives in the Civil Revision Petition. 4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 19.02.2026 PNS 4