[2026:JHHC:19325] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6087 of 2026 ------ Achal Biyom Tirkey @ Chiku @ Achal Vyom Tirkey, aged about 24 years son of Rajan Tirkey, resident of Loyla Nagar Sisai road P.O.- Sisai, P.S.- Gumla, District- Gumla .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Pinky Shaw, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-02-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.211 of 2025 arising out of S.T. Case No.201 of 2025 registered under Section 103 (1) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of the father of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that only on the basis of C.C.T.V. Footage, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that though the case is at the stage of evidence but no witness has been examined as yet. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.07.2025. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that considering the direct allegation of serious nature against the petitioner of committing the murder of father of the informant, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with the evidence if released on bail. It is, therefore, submitted that the petitioner ought not be released on bail at this stage. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner as well as his chance of absconding and tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the considered view that this is not a fit case where the above- named petitioner be released on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above-named petitioner is rejected at this stage. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-02.07.2026-Animesh/