Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010122552013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 19147/2013 Between:
1. B. SANTA KUMARI, D/O. LATE ANAND RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SENIOR LECTURER, S.V. DEGREE COLLEGE, PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE SECRETARY, A.P. COLLEGE SERVICE COMMISSION, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE DIRECTOR, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR OPEN UNIVERSITY, HYDERABAD. 5. THE PROCESSING OFFICER, OF S.V. DEGREE COLLEGE AND PRINCIPAL OF GOVERNMENT DEGREE COLLEGE, SALUR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 6. THE PRINCIPAL, S.V. DEGREE COLLEGE, PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
2
pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not fixing the seniority of the Petitioner taking only aided service and as per the instructions issued by the Government and the Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, as bad in law under Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents herein to fix the Seniority of the Petitioner as per aided service only IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 23415 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 10/5/2013, as well as earlier representations, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the 5th respondent college has surrendered the aid along with the movables and immovables belonged to the 5th respondent. It is also submitted that all the aided vacancies have been surrendered to the State. 3. Considering the same, the grievance of the petitioner cannot be adjudicated on merits in view of the changed circumstances. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
23.02.2026 PNS