Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18641 (RAJ)

BABU LAL VERMA S/O SHRI GOKUL CHAND VERMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CCP/923/2020 · 2026-02-13

Praveer Bhatnagar

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7125] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 923/2020 1. Babu Lal Verma S/o Shri Gokul Chand Verma, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village Digawada, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj) 2. Shri Mukut Vihari Lal S/o Shri Gopal Lal, Aged About 64 Years, R/o House No. 1880, Jai Lal Munshi Ka Rasta, Pehla Chauraha, Purani Basti, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur (Raj) 3. Bala Ram Saini S/o Shri Ramchandar Saini, Aged About 74 Years, R/o Plot No. 9, Road, No. 2, Sadh Wala Kuwa, Scheme No. 1, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj) 4. Babu Lal Sharma S/o Shri Nanag Ram Sharma, Aged About 76 Years, R/o Near Plot No. 347, Scheme No. 1, Vistar Yojana, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj) 2. Shri Naveen Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj) 3. Shri Sandeep Sharma, The Chief Engineer (Admn.), Public Health And Engineering Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan Jal Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj) 4. Shri Jagat Tiwari, Superintending Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Circle Alwar (Raj) 5. Shri Satish Jain, Superintending Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur (Raj) 6. Shri Sumit Kumar Gupta, Superintending Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Chhittorgarh, (Raj) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : None Present [2026:RJ-JP:7125] (2 of 2) [CCP-923/2020] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 13/02/2026 None present on behalf of both the parties. Hence, the civil contempt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/72