Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18639 (PNJ)

RAJ PAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CWP/16269/2026 · 2026-05-22

Namit Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-16269-2026 (O&M) IN THE H Raj Pal & othe State of Punjab CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUM 1. Articles 226/2 directing the regular pay s completed th became enti Allowance a speaking ord 12% per annu 2. their grievanc 22.01.2026 consideration. satisfied, if ap &M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH & others Versus Punjab & others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAM Ms. Chandani Singla, Advocate, f KUMAR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been f 226/227 of the Constitution of India the respondents to pay maternity scale instead of fixed monthly s heir probation period during ma itled to full regular salary alo and other admissible allowance der dated 18.12.2025 (Annexur um. Learned counsel for the petitione ievances, the petitioners have also (Annexure P-8) to the respond ation. She further submits that at this , if appropriate directions are issued JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CWP-16269-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondents NAMIT KUMAR cate, for the petitioners. been filed by the petitioners under India, seeking a writ of mandamus leave salary to them on their salary, as they have successfully aternity leave and consequently ongwith Grade Pay, Dearness es, particularly in view of the re P-11), alongwith interest @ titioners submits that for redressal of also served legal notice dated espondents which is still pending t this stage, the petitioners would be ssued to the respondents to consider 026 nder amus r y y s e @ of ated ding ld be sider VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.22 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-16269-2026 (O&M) and decide th bound manner 3. 4. accepts notice innocuous pray 5. through the rec 6. present petitio consider and d by the petition an opportunity months from t decision taken 22.05.2026 Vimal &M) (2) ide the said legal notice, by passing anner. Notice of motion. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Pu notice on behalf of the respondents-St us prayer made by learned counsel for I have heard learned counsel fo the record of the case. Without going into the merits o petition is disposed of with a directio and decide legal notice dated 22.01.2 etitioners expeditiously, by passing a rtunity of hearing to the petitioners, pr from the date of receipt of certified c taken thereon shall be conveyed to the Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No assing a speaking order, in a time G, Punjab, who is present in Court, State. He has no objection to the sel for the petitioners. nsel for the parties and have gone erits of the case at this stage, the irection to respondents No.3 & 4 to 2.01.2026 (Annexure P-8) submitted sing a speaking order after affording , preferably within a period of 03 ified copy of this order. Further, the d to the petitioners. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE time ourt, o the gone , the to itted rding 03 r, the VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.22 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.