Mr. K. Nagabhushanam v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/6704/2026 · 2026-03-22
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18637 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18637 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010118102026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 6704/2026 Between:
1. MR. K. NAGABHUSHANAM,, AGED 69 YEARS, S/O. LATE MR. K.C.
VENKATARAMANA, B. KOTHAKOTA, MADANAPALLE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522238.
2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMMAYYA MADANAPALLI DISTRICT, (FORMERLY CHITTOOR DISTRICT), A.P. - 516269.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, B.KOTHAKOTA POLICE STATION, ANNAMMAYYA MADANAPALLI, (FORMERLY CHITTOOR) DISTRICT - 516269.
4. MR THOLU VENKATRAMANA, S/O. LATE T. VANARASI, R/O.
RANGASAMUDRAM ROAD, B. KOTHAKOTA TOWN AND MANDAL, , ANNAMAYYA MADANAPALLI DISTRICT. PIN CODE 517370
5. MR THOLU ANJINEYULU, S/O. LATE T. VANARASI, R/O.
2
RANGASAMUDRAM ROAD, B. KOTHAKOTA TOWN AND MANDAL, , ANNAMAYYA MADANAPALLI DISTRICT. PIN CODE 517370
6. MR THOLU ADENNA, S/O. LATE T. GANGULAPPA, R/O.
RANGASAMUDRAM ROAD, B. KOTHAKOTA TOWN AND MANDAL, , ANNAMAYYA MADANAPALLI DISTRICT. PIN CODE 517370
7. MR THOLU SANKARA, S/O. LATE T. GANGULAPPA, R/O.
RANGASAMUDRAM ROAD, B. KOTHAKOTA TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT. PIN CODE 517370
8. MR THOLU RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. LATE. T.KADIRAPPA, R/O.
RANGASAMUDRAM ROAD, B. KOTHAKOTA TOWN AND MANDAL, , ANNAMAYYA MADANAPALLI DISTRICT. PIN CODE 517370
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P SUBASH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, dispose the representation given by the Petitioner to the 2nd Respondent on 03.11.2025 or any other Writ or suitable direction to the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to provide Police protection to the petitioner, his family members and the property in Survey No.1872/2 measuring 5 Acres 75 Cents equal to 2.325 Hectare at B. Kothakota, Madanapalle, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh with effective Police force giving protection and safety to the Petitioner and to his property land ….”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader.
3
3. Mr.P.Subash, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the unofficial Respondents have been unnecessarily interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner’s property. It is further submitted that, on an earlier occasion, the unofficial Respondents instituted a suit against the Petitioner, which was dismissed by the competent Civil Court.
4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the complaint of the Petitioner discloses a civil dispute in nature. Therefore, the police could not proceed further. It is further submitted that there exists an alternative efficacious remedy of instituting a Civil Suit before the competent Court against the unofficial Respondents or any other third party if they interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner’s property.
5. Be that as it may, when the unofficial Respondents or his followers or henchmen interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the immovable property of the Petitioner, he has got an alternative efficacious remedy of filing a Civil Suit for permanent injunction.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is
disposed of, granting liberty to the Petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court for appropriate relief.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
4
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 23.03.2026 PRA
5
24 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 6704 of 2026
Date: 23.03.2026 PRA