APHC010117862019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5226/2019 Between: 1. GATTU ZAKIR HUSSAIN, S/O GATTU FARUKULLA AGED 29 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, 5/255, KOSIGI ROAD, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVTHI, GUNTUR DIST., 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADONI DIVISION, ADONI, KURNOOL DIST., 4. INSPECTOR POLICE, YEMMIGANUR CIRCLE, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YEMMIGANUR POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. N NAGESH, S/O LATE N. THIPPANNA AGE- 67 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O D. NO- 4/284, SHROFF BAZAR, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. N BASAVARAJ, S/O LATE N. THIPPANNA AGED- 55 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O D. NO- 5/1228, LAKSHMIPETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT., 8. N MALLIKARJUNA, S/O LATE N. THIPPANNA AGED- 53 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O D. NO- 4/284, SHROFF BAZAR, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 9. N VEERESH, S/O LATE N. THIPPANNA AGED- 50 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O D. NO- 604, SALARPUNA SERENITY APARTMENTS 5TH MAIN, MANGARRNNANAPALYA MAIN ROAD H. S. R. LAYOUT, BANGALORE SOUTH, KARNATAKA 10. D BASHEER AHMED, S/O P. RAJASAHEB AGED 55 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, EX-MUNICIPAL VICE CHAIRMAN, R/O D. NO- 2 1/1332-4, HBS COLONY. YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 11. MARIYANI RAVIKUMAR, S/O RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT - 38 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O OPP- SRI NEELAKANTESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 12. MALA VENKOBULU, S/O MUNEPPA AGED ABOUT- 58 YEARS, OM BUSINESS R/O YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 13. MALA GADDAM HUSSIAN, S/O BUDDA KESANNA AGED ABOUT - 60 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS RIO PAI MALA GERI /CHENNAKESAVA SWAMY COLONY YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not registering the crime on the petitioner's complaints dt. 05.11.2018, 13.11.2018 and 15.11.2018 submitted against the respondents 6 to 13 and other offenders, as illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to register the crime and prosecute the accused persons for appropriate offences under penal provisions of law IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 4 and 5 to register crime on the petitioner's complaints dt. 05.11.2018, 13.11.2018 and 15.11.2018 against the respondents 6 and 13 and other offenders for appropriate offences under penal provisions of law, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. AKULA VENKATA SAI JAGADEESH 2. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3. S D GOWD The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5226 of 2019 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in registering crime on the petitioner’s complaints dated 05-11-2018, 13-11-2018 and 15-11-2018, submitted against respondent Nos. 6 to 13 and other offenders. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing respondent Nos. 1 to 5, placed before this Court the FIR index and submitted that the police registered a case in Crime No. 93 of 2019 pending the writ petition. He therefore submitted that no further orders are required for adjudication of the writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submitted that, in view of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made by both learned counsel, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 29th January, 2026 cbn 4 110 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 5226 OF 2019 29th January, 2026 cbn