HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10195 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard Mr. Neeraj Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1, 2 & 3 and Mr. Raj Kumar Tripathi, the learned counsel representing first informant-respondent-4. 2. Perused the record. 3. Petitioner-Vivek Kumar has approached this Court by means of present criminal misc. writ petition challenging the FIR dated 23.03.2026 lodged by first informant-respondent-4 Shrikant Pandey and registered as Case Crime No. 0015 of 2026, under Section 318(4) BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act, Police Station-Cyber Crime Jaunpur, District-Jaunpur. 4. After some arguments, the learned counsel for petitioners fairly gave up the prayer prayed for by means of present writ petition. It is, however, contended by the learned counsel for petitioners that in the facts and circumstances of the case, interest of justice shall better be served, in case, the present writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to Court concerned to decide the bail application of petitioners in the light of law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2021) 10 SCC 773. 5. Learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1 & 2 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners. 6. In view of above, the prayer prayed for by means of present writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neeraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Raj Kumar Tripathi Vivek Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petition is refused. 7. Having heard the learned counsel for petitioners, the learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1 & 2, upon perusal of record and considering the submissions urged by the learned counsel for petitioners, this writ petition shall stand disposed of finally with a direction to Court concerned that in case, petitioners appear before Court below and apply for bail then their bail applications shall be decided by Court concerned in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (Supra). 8. Interim order, if any, stands discharged. May 12, 2026 Vinay CRLP No. 10195 of 2026 2 (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad