[2026:RJ-JP:2345] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 876/2024 In Appeal No. 293/2004 Bhagwan Sahai Sharma S/o Sh. Ram Kishore Sharma, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Gram Sadawali, Tehsil Baswar, District Dausa Presently Posted As Class Iv Employee (Cook) At Police Line, Dausa ----Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. Shri Utkal Ranjan Sahoo, Director General Of Police, Head Quarter, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. Superintendent Of Police, District Dausa 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur ----Contemnor/Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pooran Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Almas Khanam Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha, AAAG Ms. Akshita Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 20/01/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that although, contempt petition for alleging contempt of order passed by Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur (hereinafter to be referred as 'Tribunal') cannot be entertained directly by this Court and rather, it ought to have been filed before the Tribunal and the Tribunal, after prima facie examining the [2026:RJ-JP:2345] (2 of 2) [CCP-876/2024] contempt petition, in case, contempt is made out, can send the same to this Court for passing appropriate orders. 2. Simultaneously, it has also been submitted that even otherwise, order dated 27.09.2023 passed by the Tribunal has been complied with by way of passing order dated 12.02.2025 whereby, petitioner has been granted promotion on the post of Junior Clerk against the vacancies of the year 2000-2001 and pursuant thereto, after making pay fixation, all the benefits have also been granted. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, no case of deliberate and willful disobedience is made out. 4. Hence, the contempt petition is dismissed. Notices stand discharged. 5. However, mere dismissal of contempt petition would not prejudice rights of the petitioner for claiming better benefits than granted to him vide order dated 27.09.2023, by pursuing other remedies available to him under law. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/14