Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18629 (HP)

SAMAR GILL v. STATE OF HP

CRMP/3635/2026 · 2026-08-21

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Samar Gill vs. State of H.P. Cr.MP(M) No. 1311 of 2026 21.08.2026 Present: Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General for the respondent/State. Cr.M.P. No. 3635 of 2026 An application has been filed for seeking correction in the judgment. It has been stated that name of Police Station mentioned by the Court as Police Station “Kullu”, whereas the FIR is lodged at Police Station “Manali”. A perusal of the FIR, status report and the application shows that the FIR has been registered at Manali, and Police Station Kullu was inadvertently mentioned. Since, it is purely a clerical error; hence the same is ordered to be corrected and accordingly the name of Police Station “Kullu” mentioned in para 1 shall be read as Police Station “Manali”. The present application stands disposed of. Necessary correction be made. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 21 st August, 2026 (Nikita)