Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:33097
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.344
of 2026
Decided on: 06
th August, 2026
___________________________________________________________________ Rirku Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4-State. Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced a copy of communication dated 05.08.2026 and copy of o1ce
order dated 01.07.2026, issued by the Executive Engineer, Kullu Division, HP PWD, Kullu, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid o1ce order reveals that sanction of an amount of Rs.39,963/- towards DCRG has been 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 accorded in favour of the petitioner, who has retired from service on 28.02.2005.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 28.11.2023 passed in CWP No.9222 of 2023, titled, Rirku Ram vs. State of H.P. & others, has been duly complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is accordingly disposed of as having been fully satis<ed.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of. 06 th August, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge