EKTA PARKSVILLE HOMES PVT LTD v. CHAIRMAN MAHARERA AURHOTIRY AND ORS
WP/13541/2026 · 2026-10-12
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18626 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18626 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
48 WP-13541-26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13541 OF 2026
Ekta Parksville Homes Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner Versus Chairman MahaRERA Authority & ors. …Respondents Mr. Kavan Dua, a/w Mr. Jyotibhushan Singh, for Petitioner.
CORAM :
N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATE :
12th OCTOBER 2026 P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 14th May, 2026 passed by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority.
3. The petitioner has an efficacious remedy of appeal before the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (“Appellate Tribunal”). In view of the provisions contained in Section 43 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 as to the entertainability of the appeal, the principle of exhaustion of the statutory remedy of appeal, operates with greater force and rigor.
SAINATH, PA 1/2 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.10.14 10:26:47 +0530
48 WP-13541-26.DOC
4. Therefore, the Writ Petition stands disposed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Tribunal.
5. The time spent by the petitioner in prosecuting this petition may be accounted for under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in the event the question of limitation for filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal arises.
6. It is clarified that, this Court has not entered into the merits of the matter.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH, PA 2/2