APHC010116272026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 6167/2026 Between: 1. NAGULAPALLI VENKATA RAVI, S/O SYAMALA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O 4-64, MAIN VILLAGE, UPPALAGUPTAM, UPPALAGUPTAM MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 2. NAGULAPALLI ANANDAM,, W/O VENKATA RAVI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O 4-64, MAIN VILLAGE, UPPALAGUPTAM, UPPALAGUPTAM MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT - 533201. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AMALAPURAM SUB- DIVISION, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT - 533201. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , UPPALAGUPTAM POLICE STATION, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT - 533201 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.6167 of 2026 Dated 09.03.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): MAKIREDDY MANOJ Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents 2 to 4 in interfering at the instance of certain private parties in respect of the agricultural wet lands situated at Uppalaguptam Village Uppalaguptam Mandal Dr B R Ambedkar Konaseema District more particularly i Ac 0 88 cents in R S No 606/1 out of Ac 1 58 cents and ii Ac 0 70 cents in R S No 606/2 part out of Ac 1 58 cents which are the subject matter of O S No 82/2025 pending on the file of the Honble Civil Judge Senior Division Amalapuram and in threatening to forcibly dispossess the petitioners as illegal arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the said lands except in accordance with due process of law and to pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. Makireddy Manoj, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that respondent Nos.2 to 4 are interfering, at the instance of certain private parties, in respect of the agricultural wet lands situated at Uppalaguptam Village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District, which are the subject matter of O.S.No.82 of 2025 pending on the file of 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.6167 of 2026 Dated 09.03.2026 the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Amalapuram, and are threatening to forcibly dispossess the petitioners. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that one Suda Surya Prakash Rao lodged a report before the Station House Officer on 23.02.2026. On perusal of the said report, it was revealed that the petitioners herein and third parties are having civil disputes in respect of agricultural wet lands situated at Uppalaguptam Village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District, particularly (i) Ac.0.88 cents in R.S.No.606/1 out of Ac.1.58 cents and (ii) Ac.0.70 cents in R.S.No.606/2 part out of Ac.1.58 cents, which is already the subject matter of O.S.No.82 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Amalapuram. It is further submitted that, except receiving the complaint and conducting a preliminary enquiry, the respondent police only called both the parties and advised them to maintain peace and order in the village. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to call the petitioners to the police station henceforth and not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the third parties without following due process of law. 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.6167 of 2026 Dated 09.03.2026 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 09.03.2026 RSI 5 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.6167 of 2026 Dated 09.03.2026 67 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 6167 of 2026 Date: 09.03.2026 RSI