APHC010118592015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 10358/2015 Between: 1.JANGALA SIVA SANKAR, KADAPA DIST, S/O. J.VEERA BHADRALAH, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O GANDLAPALLI VILLAGE, VONTIMITTA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.PRL SECY HOME DEPT HYD 2 OT, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER VONTIMITTA POLICE STATION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3.THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER KADAPA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in implicating 2 DEV,J W.P.NO.10358 OF 2015 the petitioner in false cases i.e., O.R.No. 59/201415 and FIR No. 114/2014 by the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein, as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of principles of natural justice and infringement of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 13677 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein not to take any'coercive steps against the petitioner's arrest in relation to O.R.No. 59/2014-15 and FIR No. 114/2014 in view of the Apex Court directions in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another (2014) 8 SCC 273, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.DEVINENI RADHA RANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP) 2.GP FOR FORESTS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 DEV,J W.P.NO.10358 OF 2015 ORDER Smt.D.Radharani, learned counsel for the petitioner on record represents that this matter has become infructuous. 2. In view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this Writ Petition, the statement of the learned counsel is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND 30.01.2026 LSP